Perspective(r) and how/why a 2.815"-esque 25-284 can shine so fucking brightly.

L to R: .257" 80TTSX,.257" 100TSX,.257" 100XLC,.243" 105 'Max,.284" 162 'Max. Shit that looks like it'll slip conditions nicely,assuredly fucking will. But it ain't like anyone would pout with the advent of a .257" 115-ish Scenar or A-Max.(grin)

So besides taking into account projectile length,it's prudent to give both bearing surface and ogive location some good thunks too. Shit with slickery profiles and modest bearing surface looks like it will make for very nice speeds,because it assuredly fucking will. Couple those exterior constants with rather nice terminal affects and you just rung the fucking bell,by default.

Just now starting to rain and I hope I see some bearded fucker in an Ark float by,if only to electrify the Fishin'.....................(grin)

Nah, I don't mean 10 years ago. Just lately while the 243AI is showing its stuff I was wondering when you would neck down the 284 case to 6mm. Looking forward to seeing how it perks for you.

284Win based stuff would prolly be my mainstays,if a 3" .473" Montucky came to light....................

This rifle goes back over 10 years now, and things have changed. Mostly turrets if I was to do it again.

But a 3.1" short action M70 with a #1 PacNor answered a lot of questions even then. This is a 284Win.

I shot alotta 120's and 140's outta a 24" 7-08 S/A 700 that I punched 284Win.

Winchester's greatest attribute,is their S/A mag confines................

Never shot/built anything .284 based, I have a Win. classic that has a Lilja #3 .243 1-8 twist spout on it,thought about punching it 6-284,is this doable,or would going Ackley be the best route?
Also,thoughts on a stock other than the HTG it currently resides in.

On a Winny,I'd go 6-284...due to the available COAL latitude inherent the platform.

With a Lilja #3,I'd do nothing other than a Sako Hunter...............

Specs on the rifles stick or are they for pappy to have Chad to build .. Wondering mindes want to know ....