data-csrf="1714607670,2cc0fd7b884a937d515dbb1233cf7838" The day things changed | As Real As It Gets

The day things changed

Steelhead

Well-known member
Nov 17, 2007
2,504
1
Here
I was out busting rocks at 600 yards the other day (ran out of MOA, new bases coming) with the latest 223AI and I am still amazed with how simple it is.

 

Big Stick

Well-known member
Nov 18, 2007
42,666
472
Paradise
The 50's outta my 1-14" 21" Hart 223AI,are 34.5MOA to 1K from a 250 zero.

Fucking 4.5-14x M1 LR though................
 

Brad Arnett

Well-known member
Nov 17, 2007
799
0
Michigan
Steelhead said:
I was out busting rocks at 600 yards the other day (ran out of MOA, new bases coming) with the latest 223AI and I am still amazed with how simple it is.
It's funny how complicated some guy's try to make it out to be.
 

Big Stick

Well-known member
Nov 18, 2007
42,666
472
Paradise
Shane's DD PosiLign nudge,is the answer to the question. You've 40 extry MOA ele on tap and the ability to mechanically center windage,to maximize erector travel.

I wish all rings had live center eccentrics...but I've wished that often and to no avail..............
 

Paul H

Well-known member
Nov 19, 2007
1,578
0
Alaska
Visit site
I savvy simplicity, but 250 bones is a bit of coin for ring/bases. I'll put it under the eventual upgrade category. A5 handle is the first order of business.
 

Paul H

Well-known member
Nov 19, 2007
1,578
0
Alaska
Visit site
I was pondering the pricing, but got to thinking it starts as a much bigger chunk of aluminum, and more importantly boring the scope offline of the bases makes for a bit more ficturing work. Though I figure mainly it's the limited market for such stuff.

The one piece 20 moa bases run over $100 for comparison.
 

Big Stick

Well-known member
Nov 18, 2007
42,666
472
Paradise
I've alotta Badger stuff,that it over 250 a pop...guts,feathers and all.

I'd prefer to see a Weaver-esque or 1913 integral base with 20MOA,that is part of the receiver..................